Cross BorderDuterte Goes Farther in Using COVID-19

Duterte Goes Farther in Using COVID-19

In recent months, Southeast Asian leaders—and leaders from many other parts of the world—have utilized the COVID-19 pandemic to expand executive powers, crack down on civil society and undermine opposition politicians, and reduce the space for freedom of the press and freedom of assembly.

The efforts to use the pandemic to reduce political space started early on, as the virus spread through Southeast Asia. In April, Cambodia’s regime passed a new emergency law that gave Prime Minister Hun Sen massive powers, while at the same time Hun Sen’s government has been aggressively arresting activists and journalists for criticizing the government’s pandemic response, even in the mildest ways. In Thailand, the government of Prayuth Chan-ocha, while taking effective measures to stem the spread of COVID-19 (after some initial foot-dragging), also is ramping up campaigns to arrest social media users critical of the government, particularly by using the COVID-19 emergency as a pretext for these arrests, according to a report by Amnesty International.

In Malaysia, the government has delayed parliament from sitting again for months, preventing the opposition coalition from taking action against the government, which came into office despite an election. (Malaysia’s prime minister is now under quarantine for fourteen days because another Malaysian official contracted COVID-19.) The Malaysian government also has arrested journalists who have investigated and criticized Malaysia’s sometimes-stumbling response to COVID-19. Other Southeast Asian states like Myanmar and even democratic Indonesia also have cracked down on dissent.

Now, however Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, who already had abused the pandemic to amass even more power, has taken the COVID-19-related crackdown on rights and freedoms one major step farther. The Philippine legislature, which is heavily controlled by Duterte allies, has now passed a far-reaching Anti-Terror bill.

Baca juga :  Kim Jong Un Menang Perang?

The bill will give the authorities massive powers to arrest people without any warrant, to conduct widespread surveillance of the population, and to label many different people as “terrorists;” the bill offers an incredibly broad definition of who might be a “terrorist.” As Alec Regino noted in the Washington Post:

In particular, it allows the warrantless arrest and detainment of those the government-appointed Anti-Terror Council deems “suspicious.” Suspicious activities could range from attempting to damage government property to simply criticizing the administration online. It also allows for the secret surveillance and wiretapping of “suspected” criminals … The bill’s loose definition of terrorism allows the government to essentially tag any and all dissenters as terrorists without any judicial oversight.

While many Filipinos, and outside observers, have become inured to the Duterte administration’s increasing undermining of rights and freedoms, as Philippine democracy crumbles and massive extrajudicial killings continue, the Anti-Terror bill could well be the biggest blow to Philippine democracy since the end of the Marcos dictatorship. (Duterte allies and supporters of the bill claim that it will not target peaceful protestors and that the bill has adequate safeguards; at the same time, Duterte has spoken positively of the Marcos regime, and sought to further rehabilitate the Marcos family.) It could easily lead to the government simply detaining any critics without charge, putting Duterte in a position not quite equal to that of Marcos—but not that far away either.

“Disclaimer: The author takes full responsibility on the content of this opinion”.

More from Cross Border

Pelosi ke Taiwan Hanya Setting-an?

Kunjungan Ketua DPR AS Nancy Pelosi ke Taiwan buat heboh kawasan Indo-Pasifik, khususnya Tiongkok. Mungkinkah ini hanya setting-an?

Perang Ukraina Hancurkan Mimpi Xi Jinping?

Perang Rusia-Ukraina hingga saat ini masih berlangsung. Sebagai negara yang sangat dekat dengan Rusia, publik menyoroti dampaknya pada Tiongkok. Apakah perang ini membawa keuntungan? Atau justru menyakiti Xi Jinping?

Timor Leste, Warisan Politik Jokowi?

Pemerintahan Jokowi memberikan dukungan agar Timor Leste jadi anggota ASEAN. Apakah Timor Leste jadi warisan politik Jokowi?

Tiongkok Harusnya Ikut Perang Ukraina?

Perkembangan teknologi jet tempur Tiongkok belakangan ini terlihat semakin mengesankan. Meski begitu, hampir tidak ada negara yang berminat beli jet tempur mereka. Mengapa demikian?

More Stories

Projo Gagal Jika Pilih Prabowo?

Setelah sebelumnya disinyalir dukung Ganjar Pranowo, kini Projo menyebut Prabowo Subianto bisa jadi capres yang pasti maju di 2024.

Prabowo Diperdaya Cak Imin?

Partai Gerindra resmi berkoalisi dengan PKB di Pilpres 2024. Mungkinkah Prabowo Subianto diperdaya Muhaimin Iskandar (Cak Imin) soal kemampuan PKB meraup dukungan di Jawa...

Sambo dan Risalah Geng Para Bintang

Kasus pembunuhan Brigadir J dengan tersangka Irjen Ferdy Sambo agaknya menguak satu fenomena menarik mengenai keberadaan “geng” di internal Polri yang sempat dikemukakan Menteri...